IONQ holder distribution

How the 3,730.03 IONQ share-equivalents issued on chain are spread across holders. Contracts are named; people are counted.

Updated 2026-09-15 04:34 UTC IONQ overview

Top 10 control

93.1%

of on-chain supply

Largest single holding

43.5%

of on-chain supply

Total holders

addresses with a balance, pools and contracts included

Shares on-chain

3.7K

share-equivalent supply

Who holds the supply

Ondo Global Markets on Ethereum

Wallets hold 99.5% of the supply here; protocols hold 0.5%.

0.5% Held by protocols pools, LPs, bridges, issuer vaults 25 of top 96
99.5% Held by wallets individual holders 71 of top 96

Share of on-chain supply across all 96 addresses holding a balance, reconstructed from this chain's own transfer history on 2026-09-15 and checked against the token's total supply. See how it is collected.

Who holds IONQ

Among the 96 largest holders read on Ethereum, individual wallets hold 99.5% of supply and contracts hold 0.5%. Individual wallets are counted, never listed: this site does not publish what a person holds.

Largest IONQ holders - protocols

11 contracts - pools, LPs, bridges and issuer vaults - among the 96 largest holders, holding 0.5% of supply. These are contracts, not people, which is why they are named.

#	Address	Shares	Share of supply	Value
1	The Quantum Stack	5.52	0.15%	$318.06
2	0x0aedf65d7e5741475c0728f0f5a64c7ccdbb5efc	4.29	0.12%	$247.15
3	0x57661f7f8f4875306a89762092b29f34799de978	3.69	0.10%	$212.25
4	0xdc3e1e07dc7f57f9bca42a6f521d5ebfdc8f93fa	2.39	0.06%	$137.71
5	0x9008d19f58aabd9ed0d60971565aa8510560ab41	1.64	0.04%	$94.42
6	0x000000000004444c5dc75cb358380d2e3de08a90	1.01	0.03%	$58.08
7	0xf1535ec5f8ea9d699c5fce7f9a5febcf69c56b33	0.31	0.01%	$17.89
8	0x28c716bc23ed77caec27f476a366318ad5f12d58	0.13	0.00%	$7.45
9	0x2d5805a423d6ce771f06972ad4499f120902631a	0.11	0.00%	$6.40
10	0x00000688768803bbd44095770895ad27ad6b0d95	0.10	0.00%	$5.93
11	0xdeadc0de0000e54725ad1bf220324717043e02bf	0.10	0.00%	$5.75

Ordered by balance, largest first. The # is a row number, not a rank.

Protocols are shown apart because a liquidity pool or an issuer vault is not an individual holder. A concentrated set of protocols usually reflects where liquidity is parked, not a handful of individual holders.