NIO holder distribution
How the 10,869.99 NIO share-equivalents issued on chain are spread across holders. Contracts are named; people are counted.
Top 10 control
99.8%
of on-chain supply
Largest single holding
90.3%
of on-chain supply
Total holders
45
addresses with a balance, pools and contracts included
Shares on-chain
10.9K
share-equivalent supply
Who holds the supply
Ondo Global Markets on EthereumWallets hold 98.0% of the supply here; protocols hold 2.0%.
- 2.0% Held by protocols pools, LPs, bridges, issuer vaults 14 of top 45
- 98.0% Held by wallets individual holders 31 of top 45
Share of on-chain supply across all 45 addresses holding a balance, reconstructed from this chain's own transfer history on 2026-09-15 and checked against the token's total supply. See how it is collected.
Who holds NIO
Largest NIO holders - protocols
| # | Address | Shares | Share of supply | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x000000000004444c5dc75cb358380d2e3de08a90 | 193.53 | 1.78% | $954.11 |
| 2 | 0xee2542f442a5ed8008e2fe3590e14f90db69f70d | 19.27 | 0.18% | $95.01 |
| 3 | 0x2d5805a423d6ce771f06972ad4499f120902631a | 2.90 | 0.03% | $14.28 |
| 4 | 0x9008d19f58aabd9ed0d60971565aa8510560ab41 | 0.51 | 0.00% | $2.53 |
| 5 | 0x41dee1855293e4450cd67459047f372d4d818143 | 0.31 | 0.00% | $1.51 |
| 6 | 0x00000688768803bbd44095770895ad27ad6b0d95 | 0.31 | 0.00% | $1.50 |
| 7 | 0x28c716bc23ed77caec27f476a366318ad5f12d58 | 0.25 | 0.00% | $1.23 |
| 8 | 0x0d07033f478f3b585397b854df4a7163cbe8986f | 0.16 | 0.00% | $0.78 |
| 9 | 0x2e2c4746db09a43f03e17a6dfe70765083defa3a | 0.12 | 0.00% | $0.59 |
| 10 | 0x691d0cf06ef378d70417fdbe13b5799200fdcaea | 0.03 | 0.00% | $0.17 |
| 11 | 0x90cbe4bdd538d6e9b379bff5fe72c3d67a521de5 | 0.02 | 0.00% | $0.10 |
| 12 | 0x1fdd2c6600312df1e1ce1f1ff4cabe504a09c352 | 0.02 | 0.00% | $0.08 |
| 13 | 0x00000000008d5f1200332af8a6813cb8377b5bfd | 0.00 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | 0x8f10b468b06c6fd214b65f87778827f7d113f996 | 0.00 | 0.00% |
Ordered by balance, largest first. The # is a row number, not a rank.
Protocols are shown apart because a liquidity pool or an issuer vault is not an individual holder. A concentrated set of protocols usually reflects where liquidity is parked, not a handful of individual holders.